Agoracom Blog Home

Archive for the ‘US Economy’ Category

Geo-Analysis Of Vote – “CYA” vs. “Save The Economy”

Posted by AGORACOM at 3:16 PM on Monday, September 29th, 2008

(Thanks to Rob Hyndman for finding this)

The Washington Post did some great (and fast) work today by geo-analyzing the votes on today’s Bailout Bill.  It can best be summarized as follows:

It’s no coincidence then that of the 205 Members who voted in support
of the bill today, there are only two — Reps. Chris Shays (R-Conn.) and
Jon Porter (R-Nev.) — who find themselves in difficult reelection races
this fall. The list of the 228 “nays” reads like a virtual target list for the
two parties.”

In other words, this bill was doomed from the beginning. It had nothing to do with “bi-partisan / let’s save the economy” patriotism.  Just a bunch of politicians looking out for their own paycheck before 300,000,000 others.

I had no problem with the outcome of the vote. Democracy rules. This wasn’t democracy.

p.s. A fantastic map here if you want to see how your state voted. Check out Florida, New York and Washington.

Regards,
George

Best Bailout Bill Headline Of The Day – “Drop Dead”

Posted by AGORACOM at 2:54 PM on Monday, September 29th, 2008

Somebody at Marketwatch.com is either completely busted, or savvy enough to try and bring some levity to the day.  You decide after looking at the following:

AGORACOM Bailout Bill Coverage Via Twitter

Posted by AGORACOM at 2:09 PM on Monday, September 29th, 2008

If you’re trying to catch up on the day’s events, check out our Twitter entries today. More than headlines, you’ll enjoy the intricate coverage all in one page.

Regards,
George

Bailout Bill FAILS To Pass

Posted by AGORACOM at 12:58 PM on Monday, September 29th, 2008

226 NO

207 Yes

Republicans vote 2:1 against their own President.  George Bush speech at 7:30 AM was not enough to rally his own troops. Very surprising but speaks volumes.

However, vote has been left open as leaders of both sides try to convince members to switch their votes.  Long shot but who knows what can of pressure can be applied.

Full details and update on my twitter account

Barry Ritholtz Makes The Case For Just Taking Our Medicine

Posted by AGORACOM at 11:15 AM on Monday, September 29th, 2008

Barry Ritholtz is one of the smartest and most-respected economic commentators on the planet. Like myself, he has largely advocated against messing with the free markets and just taking our medicine to get this mess over with.

For those of you who aren’t familiar with Barry or his position, the following quick read is highly recommended.

Though I do agree with Barry, I do concede that it is much easier to take the position when you don’t sit in any kind of fiduciary position to the country.  If you’re an elected or appointed official, it is pretty tough to shun the human instinct to solve the problem by doing something.

Regards,
George

Apple ($AAPL) Drops Below $120 – PYMWYMI Prediction Comes 1 Month Early

Posted by AGORACOM at 8:49 AM on Monday, September 29th, 2008

Not to gloat folks but I called $120 $AAPL back in June when it was trading over $174.00.  Apple fell through $120 this morning on both market weakness and, more importantly, these downgrades.

The real back-pat here comes from comparing the reasons for the downgrades with those I gave back in June.  If you don’t have time to go over them, let me sum it like this:  Higher oil prices + falling economy  = bad news for expensive Apple items.  I predicted consumers would substitute cheaper/good enough products to get the job done.

Today, Morgan Stanley states:

“Morgan Stanley analyst Kathryn Huberty cited a “decelerating” growth in
personal computer unit, while noting that the remaining source of growth
was increasingly in the sub-$1,000 market where Apple does not play.”

RBC states:

“…recent declines in consumers wanting to buy a Mac desktop or laptop
were the biggest in the last two and a half years.”

PYMWYMI – Put Your Money Where Your Mouth Is.

UPDATE: Apple trading at $110-$111 as of 10:10 AM.

Regards,
George

Poof! 5 Biggest Wall Street Investment Banks Gone In 6 Months

Posted by AGORACOM at 5:27 AM on Monday, September 29th, 2008

In March, the investment banking industry looked pretty healthy to most observers.

Today, the five biggest independent Wall Street firms have all disappeared.

  1. Bear Stearns – Forced into a merger with JPMorgan Chase in March.
  2. Lehman Brothers – Declared bankruptcy last month.
  3. Merrill Lynch – Acquired by Bank of America last week.
  4. Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs – Changed their corporate structures to become bank holding companies last week.

Remember, this list is in addition to bank failures such as IndyMac and the WaMu takeover while the CEO was on a plane.

Readers of my blog know that some bank failures were in the cards and shouldn’t be surprised but even I didn’t foresee this kind of carnage. Perhaps even more surprising is the fact that gold is not sitting at $1,500 right now…but $1,000+ gold has to be in the cards over the next couple of months.

Until then, move over Chriss Angel and David Blaine, there’s a new disappearing magic act in town.

Regards,
George

BREAKING – Barry Ritholtz Bets $1,000,000 Against “Profitable Paulson Plan”

Posted by AGORACOM at 9:33 AM on Thursday, September 25th, 2008

Barry Ritholtz, a colleague and Wall Street super-brain blogger that has called this banking fiasco pretty dead on from the outset, is calling “bullshit” on the bailout profit spin now floating around.  In fact, he is going PYMWYMI (Put Your Money Where Your Mouth Is) by issuing the following $1,000,000 challenge:

“I have a 10 year bet for those folks now pushing the “Trust me, we will make it all back
on this one trade” spin. If you who think the Paulson plan is a money maker, a cash winner,`and a net after-fees taxpayer surplus creator, put your money where your mouth is. I`bet you one million dollars, to the charity of the winner’s choice, that the current plan is a ginormous money loser.”

Anybody want to man up? Given the fact Warren Buffet laid down $5 Billion for Goldman Preferred Shares, I’d love to see him take up the challenge. To be fair, Buffet is betting on Goldman and not the government – but we’re not going to split hairs.

Unfortunately, the bigger problem is that:

  • You don’t accumulate $50 billion in wealth by making too many $1,000,000 side bets
  • Warren has already given away every penny to his favourite charity. That’s pretty much a deal-breaker.

Regards,
George

US Government Stands To Turn Big Profit From $700 Billion Bailout.

Posted by AGORACOM at 4:06 AM on Thursday, September 25th, 2008

Given the track record of most government’s, it isn’t a surprise that many US taxpayers are up in arms over what they believe to be $700 Billion going down the drain to bailout Wall Street.

The good news, if you trust Warren Buffet, is that the US Government should be able to both stave off an economic Pearl Harbor AND turn a profit – at the expense of Wall Stree – for tax payers in the process.  Here is the excerpt from his interview with CNBC:

(The bad news is that Barry Ritholtz is betting $1,000,000 this will be a huge money loser – see below)

JOE: All the outrage we’re seeing in these comments from viewers, and obviously the senators are hearing from constituents. If we take your word for it, that the government could even break-even, or only lose 50 billion, that 700 billion dollar number is out there in the public, and people think that we’re spending that.

BUFFETT: Yeah, they think that, yeah.

JOE: It seems crucially important to get the point across that, in your view, we could, the government could actually end up making money and saving the taxpayer from much worse, a much worse outcome if we didn’t do this.

BUFFETT: The government is getting 700 billion worth of assets, assuming they spend the 700 billion, they’re getting 700 billion of assets at what I regard as attractive prices. And they’ve got the staying power to hold those things. If I could get 700 billion, if I could borrow 700 billion on the government’s terms and buy these assets I’d be doing it myself. But unfortunately I’m tapped out. (Laughs.)…

…. (earlier in the interview) And there’s no one that can leverage up except the United States government.  And what they’re talking about is leveraging up to the tune of 700 billion, to in effect, offset the deleveraging that’s going on through all the financial institutions.  And I might add, if they do it right, and I think they will do it reasonably right, they won’t do it perfectly right,  I think they’ll make a lot of money.

The US government is in a position to actually do something right and turn a profit?  If they can pull it off, you can’t say it doesn’t have a flair for the dramatic.

UPDATE: Andy Kessler in the Wall Street Journal says the payoff could be in the trillions:

“My analysis suggests that Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson (a former investment banker,
no less, not a trader) may pull off the mother of all trades, which could net a trillion dollars
and maybe as much as $2.2 trillion — yes, with a “t” — for the United States Treasury…

UPDATE 2: Barry Ritholtz, a colleague and Wall Street super-brain that has called this fiasco pretty dead on from the outset, is calling “bullshit” on the profit spin.  In fact, he is going PYMWYI (Put Your Money Where Your Mouth Is) by issuing the following $1,000,000 challenge:

“I have a 10 year bet for those folks now pushing the “Trust me, we will make it all back
on this one trade” spin. If you who think the Paulson plan is a money maker, a cash winner,`and a net after-fees taxpayer surplus creator, put your money where your mouth is. I`bet you one million dollars, to the charity of the winner’s choice, that the current plan is a ginormous money loser.”

Regards,
George

Leverage and Deleveraging 101 + The $700 Billion Plan 101

Posted by AGORACOM at 2:49 AM on Thursday, September 25th, 2008

As most of you are probably experiencing yourselves, the hot topic of conversation everywhere (work, home, the gym, etc.) is the banking and financial crisis.  That means that most people who pay little to no attention to the markets are suddenly immersed in the subject and playing big time catch up.

The one question I get more than most is “what does leverage / deleveraging mean”? To avoid repeating myself, I’ve provided a layman’s explanation of the process from beginning to end.

THE QUICK ANSWER – HOW THE CREDIT CRISIS BEGAN

PART 1

There are two parts to this answer.  First, you have to understand that leverage initiated the process. Specifically, institutions would use just $1 to buy $20 or $30 worth of assets and borrow the rest.

To put that into perspective, imagine if Bob The Banker allowed you to use your $100,000 down payment to buy a $2,000,000 or even $3,000,000 asset. ($100,000 x 30)

“AWESOME!” right? Bob is your new best friend forever (BFF Banker Bob) because you can live like a rock star and accumulate assets like a big wheel without putting down much cash.

It gets even better when good times are rolling. If your $3,000,000 asset appreciates by 10% to $3,300,000, you just made $300,000 on a $100,000 investment (minus interest payments for the year).

This is so easy that you actually re-finance that asset to pull out the $300,000 and use it to buy a $9,000,000 house $300,000 x 30).  Now you’re living like a rock star, accumulating assets and generating returns that shame Warren Buffet into crossing the street when he sees you coming.

BFF Banker Bob can’t finance your purchases fast enough.  He doesn’t need any cash from you.  He just keeps refinancing your appreciating assets and using the “profit” to buy more assets.  You are highly leveraged.

PART 2

Unfortunately, all things too good to be true must come to an end. In the markets, prices do not appreciate forever.  At some point, buying either slows down and assets start dropping in price OR people start selling assets to put cash in their pocket, which also leads to assets dropping in price.  The price drops usually start out as minor but – like a domino effect – turn into major price drops.  Don’t worry about further  explanation, just accept this as fact.

In this case, your $3,000,000 asset that appreciated to $3,300,000 has now dropped to $2,700,000. This is still a good price and not an unreasonable correction from it’s original price (a small drop) – but you were so highly leveraged that even a small correction to the market put you in a negative equity situation where:

  • The mortgage is now greater than the asset
  • You don’t have any cash because you used it to keep buying other assets.

BFF Banker Bob “loves ya’ baby” but needs to keep his job and needs you to either come up with the cash or sell all of your assets fast. No ifs, no buts, no rock star status and Warren Buffet is suddenly walking back on your side of the street again.

You don’t have the cash.  BFF Banker Bob can’t sell your assets fast enough. You are deleveraging.

As he sells your assets and causes prices to further correct (small corrections), the result begins to effect people other people that were highly leveraged. The market is deleveraging.

THE QUICK ANSWER – INSTITUTIONAL EXAMPLE

The experience of an investment bank isn’t much different except for two things.  First, you could never get 30X leverage on your money but institutions can.  Second, they’ve done it to the tune of TRILLIONS OF DOLLARS.  As such, when they begin to deleverage they create a massive domino effect that trickles all the way down to everyday people like you and me.  Suddenly, despite the fact we made our mortgage payments on time and acted financially responsible, our home values have dropped 20, 30, 40% making us suddenly feel poorer than we are.

THE QUICK ANSWER -CREDIT CRISIS

At the same time banks are deleveraging, they are also refusing to lend money out to anybody but the highest rated borrowers. Want to buy a house? You better have a 30% deposit and a stellar credit rating.  This creates a credit crisis because people and businesses suddenly can’t get loans to continue financing their existence / operations.

On the other hand, people with sufficient credit status are watching this domino effect and putting a hold on all purchases in hopes of buying stuff much cheaper months from now.  Banks are doing the exact same thing.  This standoff means the economy grinds to a halt.

THE QUICK ANSWER – GOVERNMENT BAILOUT

The proposed $700 Billion bailout is not for the purposes of putting money into the pockets of poor Wall Street bankers. Rather, it is meant to be a catalyst by beginning to buy assets – even at really low prices.  If the government can set a “floor” price on assets, the standoff should end as buyers realize assets can’t get much cheaper and want to begin buying them before the government gets their hands on all of them.

Will it work? Not sure. Nobody knows. But at least you now understand the path that brought us here and the plan to get us out.

I trust the above to be satisfactory but if you are now looking for a more thorough but concise discussion, have a look at this article.

Regards,
George