Agoracom Blog Home

Archive for the ‘Web 2.0, 3.0, …’ Category

Martha Stewart Invests In Pingg.com. Congrats To My Boys Lorien and Matt

Posted by AGORACOM at 4:12 PM on Tuesday, October 28th, 2008

It gives me great pleasure to report on a positive development in these markets, especially when it involves one of my best friends.  Specifically,Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia, Inc. (NYSE: MSO) today announced an agreement to invest in, and enter a commercial agreement with, Pingg Corp. (www.pingg.com), an online event management site that offers stylish invitations and easy-to-use event planning tools.

Pingg was created by seasoned entrepreneurs Lorien Gabel and Matt Harrop, who together have founded, built and sold two successful technology startups. Yep, they’re on the verge of taking web business #3  parabolic while I still toil here at AGORACOM :-).

The site offers customizable invitations that can be delivered electronically, in print or shared on a social network.  Pingg is taking on long-time incumbant Evite by bringing a fresh Web 2.0 perspective to the space.

Pingg.com was launched in February 2008, a whole 8 months ago and has already managed to attract MSLO to the table.   Sick I tell you, just sick. I am password protecting this post from my wife and shareholders (Lorien is actually a shareholder).

Since then, approximately 2.5 million invitations have been sent through Pingg.com. Its business model combines both online advertising and paid services.

If I can take any revenge on Lorien and Matt, it is in posting their ridiculous profile pics below + telling the world that Lorien’s middle name is “Tree” and Matt’s hair color was blue when he founded start-up #1.  Now I feel better.

Congrats boys.  Much love and respect for yet another job well done.

Regards,
George

TechCrunch Is Out To Lunch

Posted by AGORACOM at 10:00 AM on Sunday, October 12th, 2008

Taking a step back from the markets for a moment, I have to point out that Michael Arrington and TechCrunch have once again proven themselves to be completely out to lunch.

First, they insist on covering every utterly ridiculous Web 2.0 “company” that is typically nothing more than a bunch of coders getting together and launching a Hail Mary in hopes of creating an overnight billion dollar company.  No business model, no hopes of monetization, just a “it is so cool that 10 zillion people will use it and I can sell it to Google” model.

Support for my contention comes from:

[A] The rapidly growing level of disappointment amongst TechCrunch readers via comments over the past year. Whereas commentors used to tread lightly in fear of getting on the bad side of the beast, they now freely attack and criticize every TC writer with the strongest attacks aimed at Michael Arrington himself.

[B] The even more rapidly growing number of companies in the TechCrunch deadpool, most of which received meaningful coverage from TC itself.

“CYPRESS” VIDEO TAKES TECHCRUNCH OVER THE DEEP END

Today, TechCrunch and Michael Arrington himself have fallen even deeper into the abyss with what can only be described as a “drama queen-esque” series of posts criticizing some Web 2.0 founders for having fun on vacation “while Rome burned”.  Arrington even goes on to add “the video video will always be associated with the end of Web 2.0.”  ………… D-R-A-M-A   Q-U-E-E-N.

This is nothing more than tabloid style journalism looking to capitalize on the panic that has gripped Silicon Valley. It is nothing more than sensationalism.  Wall Street has its AIG party to serve as its poster child of excess, so Arrington and TechCrunch sought to find their version for Silicon Valley. Unfortunately, it is nothing more than 20 people that rented a villa in Cyprus that created a video lipsynching to Journey’s Don’t Stop Believing. This group didn’t take taxpayer money and spend $440,000 in a weekend, they booked some vacation time 3 months ago and enjoyed it.

Don’t just take my word for it, a quick scan of comments to this post in the series clearly demonstrates that the overwhelming majority of readers are criticial of TechCrunch’s coverage, almost to the point of being fed up with the rapidly descending quality of articles.

Arrington and TechCrunch better get back to some serious journalism or they may be headed for their own Deadpool. The days of a bunch of nerds showing up on their doorstep, slobbering all over Arrington’s ego and getting coverage are over. Time to look for real companies with real revenues and real business models.

Regards,
George

AGORACOM Hits 101 Million Pages, 1.25 Million Visitors In First Year

Posted by AGORACOM at 10:04 AM on Friday, October 10th, 2008

I am very pleased to announce AGORACOM traffic results for the first full-year since the launch of our small-cap, wiki-powered “Investor Controlled Discussion Forums” on October 5, 2007.

If a picture is worth a thousand words, these 2 snapshots from our Google analytics is worth 101,000,000 words [CLICK ON IMAGE FOR LARGE, CLEAR GRAPH]


Suffice it to say, we are ecstatic with the results and we want to thank all of our great clients and members that believed in our model and breathed unbelievable life into this paradigm shifting platform. As demonstrated by our recent launch of TV ads on Bloomberg, CNBC and BNN , as well as, the addition of Peter Grandich, we will continue to re-invest back into the success of this community for the benefit of all. Thank-you!

When we made first made the announcement, we set out to destroy the stock discussion forum status quo that we have all come to hate over the past 10 years thanks to unrelenting spam, profanity, stock bashing, stock hyping and assorted noise. Many thought it could not be done because we could neither change habits nor unseat the incumbents. We not only knew we could, we knew that we would. Now, more than lip service, the following numbers speak for themselves:

THE TALE OF THE TAPE

(Figures for October 5, 2007 – October 5, 2008. All figures reported by Google Analytics)

  • Unique Visitors 1,245,854
  • Visits 7,639,273
  • Page Views 101,204,915
  • Pages Per Visit 13.25
  • Avg Time On Site 10:00
  • Number Of Countries/Territories 207
  • Top 10 (Canada, USA, Germany, Netherlands, UK, Belgium, Sweden, Switzerland, Austria, Mexico)

The numbers look even better when you consider

  • We built our model on quality vs quantity. As such, this is pure discussion. No spam, flaming and bickering traffic.
  • We are only focusing on small-cap and micro-cap stocks …for now.

THE STATUS QUO IS CRUMBLING

We are very happy to see the data back up our theory that investors deeply desire the ability to amalgamate and discuss individual stock investments in a civilized community. investors are no longer willing to accept the unacceptable.

Until now, the trash has ruled the day, forcing the masses to abandon discussion forums and conduct due diligence either on their own, or in small groups. It is inefficient but it is the best option we’ve had for nearly a decade.

Eventually, the market corrects inefficiencies and AGORACOM has set its sights on correcting this one.

By refusing to sacrifice quality for quantity, AGORACOM is attracting and will continue to attract smart and conscientious investors that understand the wisdom of crowds. Eventually, quality begets quality and a massive community that both generates its own content and moderates itself will replace the status quo.

HAPPY TO SEE A HAPPY COMMUNITY

Despite the plethora of great data illustrating our success, nothing makes us happier than reading the reaction of our members. Here are just some of the raving testimonials we’ve been able to pull from the site so far.

While we’re talking about our members, I want to take this moment to thank each and every one of them for believing in our model, spreading the word and breathing life into it. Without them, this would be one hell of an application with no users. A special thanks goes out to all HUB Leaders that abandoned their former communities at Stockhouse, Raging Bull, Yahoo Finance and others in hopes of a better experience. I’m glad our promises to you have been fulfilled.

BLOGS CAN NOT REPLACE DISCUSSION FORUMS

With the advent of financial blogs – and some pretty great ones that include Paul Kedrosky, Barry Ritholtz and Mark McQueen to name but a few – some might argue discussion forums are no longer necessary, even outdated. Don’t make that mistake. Blogs are great for insight into the most important economic issues from a wide array of great minds. However, they rarely stay focused on a particular topic for more than a day.

Stock discussion forums, on the other hand, provide investors with an ability to exchange ideas and analyze one particular stock 24/7/365. You might read about macro events (i.e. sub-prime or Apple earnings) on a blog but figuring out the ongoing impact on your specific stock investments requires an extended micro discussion that blogs can not provide.

CONCLUSION

This is Wiki meets IGC (investor generated content) at its finest. There are bigger communities to be sure – but can you find another vertical in which the need for a drastically more efficient model is needed more? Trillions of dollars are at stake. People’s futures are at stake. The implications of inefficient or imperfect information are severe.

Stock discussion forums are vital to the lives of so many people. I believe we are about to witness a paradigm shift that makes them valuable once again. Stay tuned for more.

Regards,
George

Capitulation Today and Tuesday? Follow My Blog And Twitter

Posted by AGORACOM at 8:24 AM on Friday, October 10th, 2008

Gang, if you want to follow my micro posts, you can follow me on Twitter as well. Here is an example of what I have posted today:

Regards,
George

U.S. Searches For “Agoracom” Skyrockets With Bloomberg / CNBC TV Campaign. “Gold Stocks” Too.

Posted by AGORACOM at 9:35 AM on Thursday, October 9th, 2008

On September 15, we announced the commencement of 30-second television ads on Bloomberg and CNBC in the United States, as well as, BNN in Canada.  Unlike search engine marketing, it can be used to be hard to measure the effectiveness of offline branding campaigns because potential new visitors don’t call you.  If we were specifically marketing our IR services, you could measure the number of prospect calls or web inquiries.

Fortunately, we now have Google Trends. Google Trends analyzes how many searches have been done for a specific term, relative to the total number of searches for that specific term over time. In this case, I wanted to see the search trend for “AGORACOM” in the United States.

In order to make comparisons easy and put them in relative terms, Google assigns the searches over time a  baseline score of 1.00.  As such, anything above 1.00 since September 15 is a good sign and anything below 1.00 is a bad sign. How good or bad would depend on how far off 1.00 the trend is.

So what is the trend for AGORACOM so far? A Google Trends chart is worth 1,000 words:

The spike is so big that the baseline of 1.00 looks like we had no searches at all in 2008 when, in fact, the spike meant the chart had to be set to increments of 10.  To put this into perspective, Imagine what the chart of a small-cap stock would look like if it was trading pretty healthy in and around $1.00 for most of the year and then suddenly spiked to almost $20.

I do concede this is still early and we will have to check this again in 30 days – but we are off to a great start.

AMERICANS SEARCHING FOR “GOLD STOCKS”

If you want to take a look at your own trends, go here.  You can view a search trend for the entire world or for a specific country.  The caveat is that Google Trends doesn’t give you reports on thinly traded search terms. As such, if your corporate name doesn’t register, try things like your industry.  For example, I queried “Gold Stocks” and the following tells me that Americans are becoming VERY interested in them!

If you are a small-cap CEO and don’t recognize the power of Web 2.0 by now, I give up 🙂

Regards,
George

TechCrunch Gets It All Wrong.

Posted by AGORACOM at 10:13 PM on Sunday, October 5th, 2008

Dan Kimerling over at TechCrunch identifies that companies like Google, Six Apart and Plaxo were born during bleak times – but then makes the mistake of drawing a causal connection between their success and the subsequent economic turnaround. As a result, he states the following:

“Given the current economic environment, continued technological innovation
is one of the things that is likely to turn the economy around and help
restore confidence in the health of the world wide economic engine.”

Sorry Dan but you are way off with your conclusion. Saying that great tech innovations lead the economy out of tough times is as illogical as saying terrible tech innovations sitting in the TC death pool are leading the economy into tough times.

THE TRUE MORAL OF THE STORY

The true moral of the story is that – in tough times – people create tools with real utility and real business models. There is neither the patience, nor the money for kids with “cool” ideas (aka DeadPool), so entrepreneurs are forced to get back to the basics in tough times and create technologies that can actually be utilized by people willing to pay for them. They are adopted into the mainstream and flourish as the economy inevitably enters recovery and prosperity.

This only further supports my well documented rants that the last 4 years has seen far too much emphasis on “cool” but utterly useless tools. It is no coincidence – but it is ironic – that the cool phase occurs as VC’s become flush with cash thanks to the success of real technologies born out of tough times.

Unfortunately, the availablity of funds leads to waaayyy too many dumb ideas, which are only accentuated by blogs such as TechCrunch that get caught up in the mania, which only leads to waaayyy more dumb ideas.

SURPRISE !! DUMB IDEAS DON’T LAST

Unfortunately – but inevitably – dumb ideas don’t last. If you need any further proof, just take a look at both the size of the TC Dead Pool and it’s accelerating rate of growth. VC’s get squeezed by the lack of exits and suddenly people in Silicon Valley are shocked at the drop off in VC funding.

TechCrunch itself is an example of this when Dan states the following in his post:

“VC funding, essential for many startups, will not come if VC funds
do not see IPOs occurring because the IPO market is all but non-existent
and corporate buyers cannot go to credit markets in order to fund acquisitions.”

Unlike Dan, however, I won’t make the mistake of creating a causal connection betwen crappy technology innovations and a weakening economy. Crappy technologies suffer in a weak economy, they don’t create a weak economy.

Likewise, great technologies are born out of scarcity and flourish in a growing economy, they don’t create it.

I hate to see the economy in a recession – but at least I can look forward to smart people once again creating great technologies.

Regards,
George

Canada Hires High-Profile Litigator To Evaluate Proposed Google-Yahoo Ad Partnership (Monopoly)

Posted by AGORACOM at 9:42 AM on Tuesday, September 30th, 2008

The Canadian Department of Justice has retained David Kent, a litigator and antitrust expert in private practice with Toronto-based McMillan LLP, to review the proposed partnership between Yahoo and Google. You can read the full article here.

Speaking on behalf of AGORACOM, our clients, their shareholders and the entire small-cap industry, we urge Mr. Kent and the CDJ to prevent the advertising partnership between Google and Yahoo, as it would significantly decrease competition within search engine marketing, leading to unnecessary higher prices.

Our position is widely supported including, for example, the World Federation of Advertisers that have expressed concerns that the deal will hand Google too much influence over the search-advertising market, which could result in higher prices and fewer options for advertisers.

In addition, leading tech blog – TechCrunch – recently published “Yahoo, We Can’t Afford A Monopoly Even If It Kills You”, which outlines in detail the significant monopoly creating risks of any such partnership.

We love Google.  We love Yahoo.  We don’t love Goohoo.

Regards,
George

Small-Cap CEO Lesson: 93% Of Americans Want To Interact With You Via Social Media

Posted by AGORACOM at 6:08 AM on Monday, September 29th, 2008

If you’re a small-cap CEO that continues to doubt the power of online investor relations, then consider the recent Cone Business In Social Media Study, which found the following:

  • 93 % of Americans believe a company should have a presence in social media,
  • 85 % believe a company should not only be present but also interact with its consumers via social media.
  • 60 % of Americans interact with companies on a social media Web site,
  • 56 % of American consumers feel both a stronger connection with and better served by companies when they can interact with them in a social media environment.
  • Almost  25% interact more than once per week.

“The news here is that Americans are eager to deepen their brand relationships through social media,” explains Mike Hollywood, director of new media for Cone, “it isn’t an intrusion into their lives, but rather a welcome channel for discussion.”

2/3 OF WEALTHY HOUSEHOLDS WANT TO INTERACT WITH YOU ONLINE

For skeptical CEO’s that may believe these statistics apply to a younger, non-target market – think again:

With respect to hard-to-reach consumers (ages 18-34), 33% believe companies should actively market to them via social networks.

With respect to the wealthiest households (household income of $75,000+), 66% of the wealthiest households and the largest households (3 or more members) feel stronger connections to brands they interact with online.

CONCLUSION

For those of you that are already deploying an online investor relations program, this study serves as further evidence that you are on the right track.

For those of you that continue to insist on outdated methods, I can only hope that you are smart enough to consider the irrefutable data and adjust your long-term plan accordingly.

Regards,
George

Leverage and Deleveraging 101 + The $700 Billion Plan 101

Posted by AGORACOM at 2:49 AM on Thursday, September 25th, 2008

As most of you are probably experiencing yourselves, the hot topic of conversation everywhere (work, home, the gym, etc.) is the banking and financial crisis.  That means that most people who pay little to no attention to the markets are suddenly immersed in the subject and playing big time catch up.

The one question I get more than most is “what does leverage / deleveraging mean”? To avoid repeating myself, I’ve provided a layman’s explanation of the process from beginning to end.

THE QUICK ANSWER – HOW THE CREDIT CRISIS BEGAN

PART 1

There are two parts to this answer.  First, you have to understand that leverage initiated the process. Specifically, institutions would use just $1 to buy $20 or $30 worth of assets and borrow the rest.

To put that into perspective, imagine if Bob The Banker allowed you to use your $100,000 down payment to buy a $2,000,000 or even $3,000,000 asset. ($100,000 x 30)

“AWESOME!” right? Bob is your new best friend forever (BFF Banker Bob) because you can live like a rock star and accumulate assets like a big wheel without putting down much cash.

It gets even better when good times are rolling. If your $3,000,000 asset appreciates by 10% to $3,300,000, you just made $300,000 on a $100,000 investment (minus interest payments for the year).

This is so easy that you actually re-finance that asset to pull out the $300,000 and use it to buy a $9,000,000 house $300,000 x 30).  Now you’re living like a rock star, accumulating assets and generating returns that shame Warren Buffet into crossing the street when he sees you coming.

BFF Banker Bob can’t finance your purchases fast enough.  He doesn’t need any cash from you.  He just keeps refinancing your appreciating assets and using the “profit” to buy more assets.  You are highly leveraged.

PART 2

Unfortunately, all things too good to be true must come to an end. In the markets, prices do not appreciate forever.  At some point, buying either slows down and assets start dropping in price OR people start selling assets to put cash in their pocket, which also leads to assets dropping in price.  The price drops usually start out as minor but – like a domino effect – turn into major price drops.  Don’t worry about further  explanation, just accept this as fact.

In this case, your $3,000,000 asset that appreciated to $3,300,000 has now dropped to $2,700,000. This is still a good price and not an unreasonable correction from it’s original price (a small drop) – but you were so highly leveraged that even a small correction to the market put you in a negative equity situation where:

  • The mortgage is now greater than the asset
  • You don’t have any cash because you used it to keep buying other assets.

BFF Banker Bob “loves ya’ baby” but needs to keep his job and needs you to either come up with the cash or sell all of your assets fast. No ifs, no buts, no rock star status and Warren Buffet is suddenly walking back on your side of the street again.

You don’t have the cash.  BFF Banker Bob can’t sell your assets fast enough. You are deleveraging.

As he sells your assets and causes prices to further correct (small corrections), the result begins to effect people other people that were highly leveraged. The market is deleveraging.

THE QUICK ANSWER – INSTITUTIONAL EXAMPLE

The experience of an investment bank isn’t much different except for two things.  First, you could never get 30X leverage on your money but institutions can.  Second, they’ve done it to the tune of TRILLIONS OF DOLLARS.  As such, when they begin to deleverage they create a massive domino effect that trickles all the way down to everyday people like you and me.  Suddenly, despite the fact we made our mortgage payments on time and acted financially responsible, our home values have dropped 20, 30, 40% making us suddenly feel poorer than we are.

THE QUICK ANSWER -CREDIT CRISIS

At the same time banks are deleveraging, they are also refusing to lend money out to anybody but the highest rated borrowers. Want to buy a house? You better have a 30% deposit and a stellar credit rating.  This creates a credit crisis because people and businesses suddenly can’t get loans to continue financing their existence / operations.

On the other hand, people with sufficient credit status are watching this domino effect and putting a hold on all purchases in hopes of buying stuff much cheaper months from now.  Banks are doing the exact same thing.  This standoff means the economy grinds to a halt.

THE QUICK ANSWER – GOVERNMENT BAILOUT

The proposed $700 Billion bailout is not for the purposes of putting money into the pockets of poor Wall Street bankers. Rather, it is meant to be a catalyst by beginning to buy assets – even at really low prices.  If the government can set a “floor” price on assets, the standoff should end as buyers realize assets can’t get much cheaper and want to begin buying them before the government gets their hands on all of them.

Will it work? Not sure. Nobody knows. But at least you now understand the path that brought us here and the plan to get us out.

I trust the above to be satisfactory but if you are now looking for a more thorough but concise discussion, have a look at this article.

Regards,
George

NY Times Reports Landlines Out, Swedes Discover Brain Cancer In

Posted by AGORACOM at 7:18 PM on Sunday, September 21st, 2008

Talk about tragic irony. Read these headlines (and related articles) released on September 20 and 21 respectively:

Users Are Tossing Their Landlines Overboard

-  Mobile Phone Use Raises Children’s Risk Of Brain Cancer 5 Fold.

Scary. Technology is great but this serves as an example of what can happen when we blindly rush into it.

I love technology as much as anyone but my kids won’t have (or need) anything more than a simple text messaging device.

Hat-tip to Rob Hyndman for discovering the latter study.

Regards,
George