Agoracom Blog Home

Archive for the ‘All Recent Posts’ Category

Enthusiast Gaming $EGLX.ca – As millions of dollars pour in, #Esports teams offer varying visions of the future $EPY.ca $FDM.ca $WINR $TCEHF $ATVI $TNA.ca

Posted by AGORACOM-JC at 9:00 PM on Sunday, April 21st, 2019

SPONSOR: Enthusiast Gaming Holdings Inc. (TSX-V: EGLX) Uniting gaming communities with 80 owned and affiliated websites, currently reaching over 75 million monthly visitors. The company’s partial 2018 (first 9 months) revenue of $7.4 million representing a 625% increase over the same period in 2017.

Images
EGLX: TSX-V
———————————-

As millions of dollars pour in, esports teams offer varying visions of the future

  • Tens of millions of dollars continue to flow towards top esports organizations, with Gen.G announcing a $46 million investment round Wednesday,
  • A raise featuring money from a mix of Silicon Valley venture capital firms, figures in traditional sports and actor Will Smith.

Gen.G., the parent company of the Overwatch League’s Seoul Dynasty, recently brought in $46 million in fundraising. (Robert Paul/Robert Paul) ByNoah Smith April 17

Tens of millions of dollars continue to flow towards top esports organizations, with Gen.G announcing a $46 million investment round Wednesday, a raise featuring money from a mix of Silicon Valley venture capital firms, figures in traditional sports and actor Will Smith.

Flush with cash, and in some cases strengthened by the enforced scarcity of a franchise model in publisher-driven leagues built around games such as Overwatch and League of Legends, esports organizations are starting to embark on long-term visions to shore up their positions for the future. The visions themselves are far from uniform however, as some seek to emulate traditional sports teams while others see something quite different, operating more like full-on corporations than merely a competitive organization.

Akin to European sports clubs that have teams which compete in various sports — think Maccabi Tel Aviv, Real Madrid, and Bayern Munich — esports organizations are companies that own teams which participate in several different video games. But for some their business model extends into other areas as well, including content creation and apparel. In this way esports organizations are breaking from the established business models of traditional sports, based heavily on television broadcast revenue and box office receipts, to reimagine their place in a new, online and global industry. The financial ecosystem around many such outfits encompasses competitive video games, player streaming on platforms like Twitch and Mixer, original unscripted content and even gambling.

Cloud9, which raised $50 million last year and $25 million in 2017, has decided to place some of its upcoming focus and capital on creating a competitive structure for young players.

“Imagine baseball was invented last week, what would Little League look like?” said Dan Fiden, president of Cloud9. Fiden said that, unlike traditional sports which have youth leagues, esports for kids is completely unstructured.

“Some of the players we sign have never been coached in anything ever,” he said.

The organization’s planned Los Angeles headquarters will feature a public space where fans can meet up, interact with players, watch games and it will also contain the “equivalent of the esports little league diamond,” according to Fiden.

“We want to continue to continue to launch programs like this to learn how best to organize and coach kids. We want to figure out the curriculum,” Fiden said, but noted his organization’s core business remains trying to win games.

Gen.G is also trying to move beyond the footprints of existing sports teams via its international focus and content production, both common in an industry that has been always been international and which considers South Korea to be its Mecca. For content, fans expect access to top players through Twitch and YouTube.

“We don’t have to just build versions of what we’ve seen yesterday,” said Gen,G CEO Chris Park, who was previously a senior executive for Major League Baseball.

Park said his company will continue to place a heavy focus on growing in China, Korea (they own the Seoul Dynasty team in Overwatch League), and the United States.

In a departure from traditional sports, he said Gen.G will not only be looking to attract top players, but top content creators as well, since they plan to “create content that shows gaming is a culture and way of life.”

The 100 Thieves franchise, which received a high profile investment from singer Drake, has established itself as an apparel company, with its limited edition gear quickly selling out after its becomes available online.

The differing approaches illustrate that esports is still very much amorphous and in its very early stages, even as investor attention — and money — has arrived en masse. Park said that his organization was “oversubscribed within hours” of announcing their latest raise. Fiden said there has been “strong interest” in Cloud9 from investors since 2017.

Last year’s notable raises, in addition to Cloud9, include $38 million for Echo Fox, $37 million for TeamSoloMid, and $26 million, including money from Michael Jordan, for Team Liquid.

A 2018 Goldman Sachs report stated that esports have landed venture capital investment totaling $3.3 billion since 2013, and $1.4 billion as of the middle of last year.

“We [the esports industry] look like the NBA did in late 60s, early 70s,” said Canaan Partners’ Maha Ibrahim, who has led the firm’s investment in Gen.G.

Driving the spiraling valuations and investments, according to Ibrahim and fellow investor in Gen.G, Roger Lee, of Battery Ventures, are a mix of Overwatch League’s exposure on ESPN and an overwhelming amount of data to support the viability of the enterprise. Seventy-nine percent of esports viewers are under 35 years old and this audience, on Twitch and YouTube, outstrips HBO, Netflix, and ESPN combined, according to Goldman Sachs.

Lee believes top esports teams have more visibility than a comparable baseball team, and that once esports starts “generating more interest, they’ll be worth the same amount.”

Ibrahim agreed, saying, “Teams will be billion-dollar entities, of that I am sure.”

For now, valuations, like those for many start-ups, are based on the hope that attention will be converted to revenue at some future date. A plurality of team revenue is from sponsorships, according to Goldman Sachs, which projects that by 2022 that will shift to come from media rights.

Video games, including the professional competitive element, are not widely seen as a threat by traditional sports leagues or teams — especially those like the NBA and most of its franchises, which have co-opted them. But in Hollywood, games like the Fortnite are increasingly seen as a threat. Netflix, which is expected to spend $15 billion on shows this year said in a recent shareholder letter that, “We compete with (and lose to) Fortnite more than HBO.”

“This is more than a movement, it’s the next generation of media and media consumption,” Ibrahim said.

Source: https://www.washingtonpost.com/sports/2019/04/17/millions-dollars-pour-esports-teams-offer-varying-visions-future/?utm_term=.bef4a811e2d1

New Age Metals Inc. $NAM.ca – Supply And Demand Outlook Favors #Palladium Vs. Platinum $WG.ca $XTM.ca $WM.ca $PDL.ca

Posted by AGORACOM-JC at 12:16 PM on Thursday, April 18th, 2019

SPONSOR: New Age Metals Inc. The company owns one of North America’s largest primary platinum group metals deposit in Sudbury, Canada. Updated NI 43-101 Mineral Resource Estimate 2,867,000 PdEq Measured and Indicated Ounces, with an additional 1,059,000 PdEq Ounces in the Inferred. Learn More.

NAM: TSX-V

———————

Supply And Demand Outlook Favors Palladium Vs. Platinum

  • Palladium has outperformed platinum ever since the fundamentals of supply and demand have changed due to the diesel emissions scandal.
  • The gap between platinum and palladium has shrunk in recent weeks, which would break the current trend of palladium outperforming platinum if it continues.
  • Both the fundamental and technical pictures point to the trend staying in place relative to platinum and palladium despite the recent hiccup.

The biggest source of demand for platinum (PPLT) and palladium (PALL) is the automotive industry where emission standards are becoming increasingly stringent. These standards are driving demand for platinum and palladium due to their ability to help reduce harmful emissions. The result has been a sort of competition between the two of them.

However, the competition has become somewhat one-sided ever since the platinum market was rocked in 2015 by the emissions scandal or “Diesel Gate” involving Volkswagen (OTCPK:VWAGY). The reason is because platinum is heavily used in vehicles with diesel engines. On the other hand, palladium is associated with gasoline engines.

Cars powered by diesel engines have since fallen out of favor, and people are now turning towards cars powered by gasoline engines. This trend does not look to change anytime soon, but it’s set to continue for the foreseeable future. This is bullish for palladium and bearish for platinum. The result can be seen in the supply and demand equation for palladium and platinum.

The market for palladium has a deficit with a surplus for platinum

The emissions scandal has fundamentally altered the landscape for vehicles powered by diesel and gasoline engines and, by extension, platinum and palladium. The former is seeing demand decrease, and the latter is seeing demand increase as there is a shift away from diesel-powered cars towards gasoline-powered cars.

The two tables reveal that the platinum market has a surplus, with supply exceeding net demand. Except for industrial demand, every other segment, including autocatalyst, jewelry, and investment, is in decline. While supplies from mining have stayed roughly the same, platinum recycling is adding to the surplus of platinum in the market. The trend is clearly bearish for platinum.

Platinum supply and demand (Unit: 1000 oz)
Supply 2016 2017 2018
South Africa 4392 4449 4471
Russia 717 703 657
Others 988 953 980
Total supply 6097 6105 6108
Demand
Autocatalyst 3342 3218 3052
Jewelry 2412 2400 2363
Industrial 1806 2022 2321
Investment 620 361 89
Total demand 8180 8001 7825
Recycling -1934 -2072 -2215
Net demand 6246 5929 5610
Surplus/deficit -149 176 498

Source: Johnson Matthey

The opposite is true for palladium. Supply of palladium falls short of net demand and is driven primarily by the increased demand in the autocatalyst segment. Recycling has made more palladium available, but supplies have yet to eliminate the deficit in the market for palladium. Overall, the trend for palladium looks to be a lot better compared to platinum.

Palladium supply and demand (Unit: 1000 oz)
Supply 2016 2017 2018
South Africa 2570 2550 2590
Russia 2773 2406 2840
Others 1417 1405 1450
Total supply 6760 6361 6880
Demand
Autocatalyst 7951 8428 8655
Jewelry 191 173 166
Industrial 1875 1832 1855
Investment -646 -386 -555
Total demand 9371 10047 10121
Recycling -2491 -2899 -3212
Net demand 6880 7148 6909
Surplus/deficit -120 -787 -29

The forecast for 2019 calls for more of the same, assuming there are no unforeseen events that could disrupt the supply and demand equation. Platinum will have a surplus, and palladium, a deficit. The trend established in recent years as shown in the two tables is not expected to change. That is bullish for palladium, but bearish for platinum.

Divergence in prices for platinum and palladium

As a result of a favorable outlook, palladium prices have vastly outperformed platinum. While platinum used to command a much higher price than palladium, the roles have now been reversed, and palladium is now worth more. The chart below tracks the relationship between platinum and palladium prices.

Notice that at its peak in March, a troy ounce of palladium was worth almost two ounces of platinum. That ratio has now come down, and palladium is now worth 1.5 ounces of platinum. A significant change, but still far removed from the days when platinum was more expensive than palladium.

However, the fact remains that the gap between platinum and palladium has shrunk with platinum outperforming palladium during this time frame. The gap could continue to shrink, but it could also begin to widen as before. Which of the two is more likely to happen will depend on a few factors that should be taken into consideration.

Can platinum and palladium be substituted for one another in the manufacture of an autocatalyst?

The short answer is yes, but only to a certain extent. While platinum and palladium are more suitable and preferred in diesel and gasoline vehicles, respectively, it is not absolutely necessary. The more expensive palladium becomes relative to platinum, the more manufacturers may be inclined to look into replacing palladium with platinum in the manufacture of an autocatalyst. Not necessarily completely, but at least partially.

In theory, this should act as a cap on palladium relative to platinum. If the gap in prices between the two becomes too extreme, precious metal substitution could force the ratio between palladium and platinum to reverse and narrow. There would be less demand for palladium and demand for platinum would increase under these conditions. However, in practice, it is difficult to replace more expensive palladium with cheaper platinum.

The two precious metals are only needed in trace amounts, and the price difference would have to be very severe to make a noticeable difference in the final cost of a vehicle. It also takes a lot of time and expense to test that changes in precious metal composition in an autocatalyst meet desired specifications. In a nutshell, while it’s possible, it’s almost certainly not worth the trouble to replace platinum with palladium or vice versa.

Why gold prices affect platinum more than palladium

Unlike palladium, platinum prices are more prone to being influenced by the price of gold (GLD). The reason is because platinum is heavily used in jewelry, much more than palladium. Because of this, platinum is in direct competition with gold. In fact, people often have to decide which of the two, gold or platinum, they will select in a purchase.

People will more often than not pick gold, but they may be tempted to go for platinum if the former is much more expensive than the latter. Rising gold prices are, therefore, good for platinum because it makes platinum a more attractive substitute. But if gold prices fall, then there is less need for platinum because most people tend to prefer gold.

It’s, therefore, necessary that we look at gold when considering where platinum will go relative to palladium. The ratio between gold and platinum prices has changed recently as gold prices have gone down. A previous article discussing why gold is likely to face pressure can be found here.

The chart above tracks the relationship between platinum and gold prices. Notice that while an ounce of platinum was roughly equal to 60% of gold at its low, the ratio has gone up and is now at almost 70%. What this basically means is that platinum’s appeal as an alternative has declined versus gold. This should be seen as a negative for platinum demand, which could put downward pressure on the price of platinum.

Palladium looks to be priming itself for a big move

Palladium prices have been going sideways after a big drop from their recent highs. In fact, the chart pattern for palladium resembles that of a symmetrical triangle or a coil. If this technical analysis is correct, then a big move may be coming once consolidation is done. The triangle could resolve to the downside, but it’s more likely to continue the long-term trend, which is up.

Both the fundamental and technical pictures suggest that a move to the upside is the most probable outcome. In contrast, platinum is being held back by a number of issues as a previous article explains here. This would reverse the narrowing of the spread between platinum and palladium and, instead, widen the gap that exists.

The ratio between palladium and platinum has been stuck at around 1.5, as previous charts reveal. This ratio could decrease further, but the most likely path is for the ratio to resume its previous uptrend after the time it has spent consolidating. This would be consistent with the price of palladium outperforming that of platinum.

Palladium will outperform platinum

It’s important to mention that the long-term picture for platinum and palladium in terms of demand is not a good one. Recent research suggests that it will one day be possible to make an autocatalyst without the need for any precious metals such as platinum and palladium. If this happens, then both metals will be left without their biggest source of demand.

Furthermore, electrical vehicles are on the rise, and they do not emit the harmful emissions that platinum and palladium are tasked with reducing. The challenge for platinum and palladium will be to find new applications where they can be used. Otherwise, the future of platinum and palladium does not look all that bright.

Having said that, palladium is most likely to outperform platinum with both charts and supply and demand in its favor. There is still a shortage of palladium that the market will not be able to resolve in the short term. The supply deficit, combined with the recent consolidation in prices after a major correction, will most likely result in palladium rising again.

On the other hand, gold is under pressure, and it’s hard to see platinum doing well when gold is struggling. There is also a surplus of platinum that will not go away anytime soon. Therefore, barring a major supply disruption, such as a major strike that drastically reduces supplies, platinum is highly unlikely to do as well as palladium. Platinum may have outperformed palladium in recent weeks, but that should soon reverse.

Source: https://seekingalpha.com/article/4255191-supply-demand-outlook-favors-palladium-vs-platinum

North Bud Farms Inc. $NBUD.ca – How to Value a #Pot #Cannabis Stock $WEED.ca $CGC $ACB $APH $CRON.ca $HEXO.ca $TRST.ca $OGI.ca

Posted by AGORACOM-JC at 11:32 AM on Thursday, April 18th, 2019

SPONSOR: North Bud Farms Inc. (NBUD:CSE) Sustainable low cost, high quality cannabinoid production and procurement focusing on both bio-pharmaceutical development and Cannabinoid Infused Products. Click Here For More Information

NBUD: CSE

—————

How to Value a Pot Stock

By Tara Lachapelle and Sarah Halzack

While cannabis investors are distracted by seeds and crop yields, corporations with M&A in mind see a more lucrative future in brand-building and retail.

Cannabis growers have hardly any revenue and their product is still illegal in their most desirable market, the U.S. That’s not stopping investors and corporate giants from spending billions of dollars to take stakes in these companies. They obviously see growth potential. And yet the question remains, how do you even value a pot business? 

Altria Group Inc., the U.S. tobacco leader and maker of Marlboro cigarettes, announced in December that it was buying 45 percent of Cronos Group Inc., one of Canada’s growing number of cannabis producers and among the industry’s high-flying stocks. The $1.8 billion transaction left us wondering: How did Altria determine that price? After all, in the period before the deal, Cronos generated sales of less than $4 million – no, that’s not a typo – and certainly no profits. Recreational pot had only just become legal in Canada two months earlier. Altria, a $105 billion market-cap company that rarely does splashy deals, placed immense value on a barely existent business in a nascent market.

The dynamics were the same when Constellation Brands Inc., a beer and liquor conglomerate, spent $3.8 billion to increase its stake in Canopy Growth Corp. earlier in 2018. Canopy’s CEO has said he wants it to become the Google of pot â€“ but he’ll need to add a few more digits to its sales figures. 

Seeing Green

The projected growth of the worldwide cannabis market has some investors pouring money into newcomer companies with tiny revenue and no profits

Source: Arcview Market Research, BDS Analytics

It’s a tricky thing to gauge the worth of assets that will potentially be highly valuable down the road – but are difficult to quantify just yet. Looking at other industries where this has been the case is helpful. Even if their businesses aren’t perfect comparisons, the method of valuing them can be instructive. 

Take the natural-resources space, where the focus is often on non-financial metrics. They include production capacity and tangible assets, such as proved oil reserves – which is to say, how much fuel a producer can likely pump from their land. It can be argued that this is similar to how individual investors already have been gauging cannabis companies, dazzled by how many kilograms can be produced and how many acres of greenhouse they have.

But the downside to this approach for cannabis is that it puts too much emphasis on supply-chain processes that may become commoditized, and a rudimentary focus on capacity doesn’t capture how the early movers in this market can differentiate themselves. The industry’s novelty also distracts from what can be a challenging business from an operational standpoint. For example, Aphria Inc.’s share price increased more than elevenfold over the last five years, but in its latest quarter the business was hamstrung by supply shortages and packaging issues. 

A better comparison for cannabis may be the biotechnology space. Deals for drug developers involve big, risky bets on future potential blockbusters. These products may not generate revenue yet, but they aim to address very specific markets and are expected to have an economic moat that wards off competition. For pharmaceuticals, that moat comes from patent exclusivity that prevents copycat versions of a therapy. In some ways, this is what the more advanced cannabis companies are looking to accomplish. They won’t have patents in the same way, but they do aim to create intellectual property and specialized brands that appeal to certain types of customers. And they want to be first to form those customer relationships.

Remember, this market will be far more expansive than simply selling a box of joints. There’s an opportunity to create all sorts of consumer products, and the marketing can vary widely – from wellness drinks and beauty items infused with cannabidiol, or CBD (the part of cannabis that doesn’t deliver a high), to “sin” products like marijuana-infused edibles, or something more akin to having a glass of wine.

Taking Off

As the recreational cannabis market surpasses the medical one, it will become increasingly important for companies to create compelling brands

Source: Arcview Market Research, BDS Analytics

Look at it this way: Altria doesn’t own tobacco farms. It owns high-margin brands that source from tobacco growers. So when it’s studying the future of marijuana, it’s not looking solely at production. It’s looking for unique brands that can be scaled up by a team with the necessary know-how. In the case of Cronos, CEO Mike Gorenstein said on the last earnings call that the company is trying to differentiate itself with pre-rolled joints, adding that innovation around branding and efficiency will be “a bigger differentiator than just cultivation.”

Knowing the important role that brand-building will play in the next phase of the cannabis industry’s growth story, it’s useful to study these companies’ senior management teams and look for branding and retail pedigree. It’s a good sign that Cronos’s head of marketing has had stints at PepsiCo Inc. and Mondelez International Inc., and that Tilray Inc. has a one-time Starbucks Corp. executive running its retail strategy.

Green Growth Brands Inc., based in Ohio and Ontario, has a deep bench of such leaders: Its CEO is Peter Horvath, a former executive at American Eagle Outfitters Inc., Victoria’s Secret and DSW. His key deputies come from the likes of Abercrombie & Fitch Inc. and Bath & Body Works. They are rightly emphasizing that retail expertise is a point of distinction and an advantage as they develop targeted brands such as Green Lily, aimed at women, and Camp, aimed at active, outdoorsy types. This brand-centricity seems to be paying off: Even though Green Growth doesn’t have as large a market capitalization as the Canada-based players, it recently scored a partnership with Simon Property Group Inc. to open more than 100 CBD stores in the mall giant’s shopping centers, and its CBD products will be sold in 96 DSW locations.

That U.S. footprint might do it good down the road, as wider marijuana legalization seems likely. While much of the focus these days is around the promise of the Canadian market, it’s important not to let that obscure what should be the cannabis world’s real end game. 

Sizing Up The U.S. Prize

California alone has a larger population than Canada, illustrating why the U.S. remains such a tantalizing opportunity for the cannabis industry

Source: Statistics Canada, U.S. Census Bureau

And, in general, the Canadian companies that have received such bountiful investor buzz are at something of a disadvantage on the branding front, notes Bethany Gomez, a cannabis industry analyst at Brightfield Group. Because of strict rules in Canada regarding logo size and other packaging details for currently available cannabis products, they are simply limited in how distinctive they can make their presentation.

Wherever it’s sold, if the cannabis business is to grow as big as the industry’s bulls hope, it is going to have to successfully court non-users and infrequent users. That’s where newer innovations, such as edibles and beauty items, may be more important than smokeable products. 

Not Quite Cannabis Crazy

In U.S. markets that have legalized recreational marijuana, many people are still not consuming cannabis, underscoring the opportunity to grow addressable market

Source: BDS Analytics Consumer Insights

The companies that become the breakout stars in the legal cannabis era will be the ones that have a vision for how to create demand for such goods, whether through curiosity-inducing product, a great in-store experience or alluring marketing. These capabilities â€“ not merely spreading more seeds in soil – should be a critical part of valuing the pot pioneers.

Source: https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2019-04-18/altria-shows-there-s-a-better-way-to-value-cannabis-stocks

Tartisan Nickel $TN.ca – New research exposes extent of mineral demand for renewable energy technologies $ROX.ca $FF.ca $EDG.ca $AGL.ca $ANZ.ca

Posted by AGORACOM-JC at 10:03 AM on Thursday, April 18th, 2019

SPONSOR: Tartisan Nickel (TN:CSE)  Kenbridge Property has a measured and indicated resource of 7.14 million tonnes at 0.62% nickel, 0.33% copper. Tartisan also has interests in Peru, including a 20 percent equity stake in Eloro Resources and 2 percent NSR in their La Victoria property. Click her for more information

Tc logo in black
TN: CSE
Fact Sheet
—————————-

New research exposes extent of mineral demand for renewable energy technologies

by University of Technology, Sydney

  Credit: CC0 Public Domain

  • Under a 100 percent renewable energy scenario, metal requirements could rise dramatically, requiring new primary and recycled sources
  • Clean technologies rely on a variety of minerals, principally cobalt, nickel, lithium, copper, aluminum, silver and rare earths.  Cobalt, lithium and rare earths are the metals of most concern for increasing demand and supply risks

The growing demand for minerals and metals to build the electric vehicles, solar arrays, wind turbines and other renewable energy infrastructure necessary to meet the ambitious goals of the Paris Climate Agreement could outstrip current production rates for key metals by as early as 2022, according to new research by the UTS Institute for Sustainable Futures.

The study, commissioned and funded by U.S. non-profit organisation EarthWorks, shows that as demand for minerals such as lithium and rare earths skyrockets, the already significant environmental and human impacts of hardrock mining are likely to rise steeply as well. In a companion white paper, Earthworks makes the case for a broad shift in the clean technologies sector towards more responsible minerals sourcing.

“We have an opportunity, if we act now, to ensure that our emerging clean energy economy is truly clean – as well as just and equitable – and not dependent on dirty mining,” said Payal Sampat, Earthworks Mining Director. “As we scale up clean energy technologies in pursuit of our necessarily ambitious climate goals, we must protect community health, water, human rights and the environment.”

“The responsible materials transition will need to be scaled up just as ambitiously as the 100 percent renewable energy transition,” said Dr Sven Teske, Research Director at the UTS Institute for Sustainable Futures.

Doing so will require a concerted commitment from businesses and governments, according to the report’s lead author Elsa Dominish, Senior Research Consultant at the UTS Institute for Sustainable Futures. “We must dramatically scale up the use of recycled minerals, use materials far more efficiently, require mining operations to adhere to stringent, independent environmental and human rights standards, and prioritise investments in electric-powered public transit.

“The renewable energy transition will only be sustainable if it ensures human rights for the communities where the mining to supply renewable energy and battery technologies takes place. If manufacturers commit to responsible sourcing this will encourage more mines to engage in responsible practices and certification. There is also an urgent need to invest in recycling and reuse schemes to ensure the valuable metals used in these technologies are recovered, so only what is necessary is mined,” Ms Dominish said.

Research highlights:

  • Under a 100 percent renewable energy scenario, metal requirements could rise dramatically, requiring new primary and recycled sources
  • Clean technologies rely on a variety of minerals, principally cobalt, nickel, lithium, copper, aluminum, silver and rare earths.  Cobalt, lithium and rare earths are the metals of most concern for increasing demand and supply risks
  • Batteries for electric vehicles are the most significant driver of accelerated minerals demand.
  • Recycled sources can significantly reduce primary demand, but new mining is likely to take place and new mining developments linked to renewable energy are already underway
  • Responsible sourcing is needed when supply cannot be met by recycled sources

Minerals extraction already exacts significant costs on people and the environment, fuelling conflict and human rights violations, massive water pollution and wildlife and forest destruction. Most of the world’s cobalt, used in rechargeable batteries for electric vehicles and phones, is mined in the Democratic Republic of Congo, often by hand in unsafe conditions using child labor. Earlier this year in Brazil, the collapse of two tailings dams at Vale’s Brumadinho iron ore mine killed hundreds of workers and local residents. Independent research that analyses decades of data on mine waste dam failures reveals that these catastrophic failures are occurring more frequently and are predicted to continue to increase in frequency.

“In Norway, the government tell us we have to sacrifice our fjords to mine copper for clean energy,” said Silje Karine Muotka, a member of the Saami Parliament, which is fighting a mine proposal in their traditional reindeer herding grounds. “I recognise that we need materials for new technologies, but we should look for ways to get them that do not harm the environment or threaten native culture.” 

“Solar and wind production is growing rapidly, while the cost of clean energy technologies has continued to fall,” said Danny Kennedy, Managing Director at the California Clean Energy Fund. “If the clean tech revolution has taught us anything, it is that humanity possesses boundless capacity for innovation. Our task is to establish the parameters within which innovators can innovate to ensure that clean energy is truly clean.”

Earthworks commissioned the ISF research as part of its newly-launched ‘Making Clean Energy Clean, Just & Equitable’ initiative, which aims to ensure that the transition to renewable energy is powered by responsibly and equitably sourced minerals, minimizing dependence on new extraction and moving the mining industry toward more responsible practices.

Source: https://phys.org/news/2019-04-exposes-extent-mineral-demand-renewable.html

CLIENT FEATURE: NORTHBUD $NBUD.ca Signs $20 MILLION Binding LOI For Acquisition of Multi-State Licensed Operator Eureka Vapor WEED.ca $CGC $ACB $APH $CRON.ca $HEXO.ca $TRST.ca $OGI.ca

Posted by AGORACOM-JC at 4:19 PM on Wednesday, April 17th, 2019

WHY NORTHBUD FARMS?

  • Canadian regulatory door for CIP (Cannabinoid Infused Products) is opening this year
    as shown in other legal jurisdictions (Colorado, Washington, Nevada, California)
  • Infused products sector has become the highest margin segment of the industry
  • Positioned to be a raw input producer for this space
  • Currently working with multiple food, beverage and science companies to provide safe standardized cannabinoid infused raw inputs for large scale GMP manufacturing of products
  • Signed Binding Letter of Intent to Enter U.S. Market with Strategic Acquisition of Multi-State Licensed Operator Eureka Vapor Read Release

CHECK OUT OUR RECENT INTERVIEW

FULL DISCLOSURE: NORTHBUD is an advertising client of AGORA Internet Relations Corp.

Enthusiast Gaming $EGLX.ca – Will Smith takes slice of #Esports team’s US$46 million financing $EPY.ca $FDM.ca $WINR $TCEHF $ATVI $TNA.ca

Posted by AGORACOM-JC at 11:24 AM on Wednesday, April 17th, 2019

SPONSOR: Enthusiast Gaming Holdings Inc. (TSX-V: EGLX) Uniting gaming communities with 80 owned and affiliated websites, currently reaching over 75 million monthly visitors. The company’s partial 2018 (first 9 months) revenue of $7.4 million representing a 625% increase over the same period in 2017.

Images
EGLX: TSX-V
———————————-

Will Smith takes slice of Esports team’s US$46 million financing

  • Actor Will Smith and Japanese soccer legend Keisuke Honda are among the new investors in esports franchise Gen.G, which announced a new $46 million round of financing Wednesday.

Eben Novy-Williams, Bloomberg News

Will Smith reacts at a closing ceremony press conference during the 2018 FIFA World Cup at Luzhniki Stadium on July 13, 2018 in Moscow, Russia. (Photo by Dan Mullan/Getty Images). , Dan Mullan/Getty Images Europe

Actor Will Smith and Japanese soccer legend Keisuke Honda are among the new investors in esports franchise Gen.G, which announced a new $46 million round of financing Wednesday.

Smith and Honda’s Dreamers Fund, a investment vehicle they launched last year, are joined by Los Angeles Clippers minority owner Dennis Wong and Michael Zeisser, former chairman of U.S. investments at Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.

“It’s exciting to see the worlds of technology, media, sports and now celebrity come together,” said Chris Park, chief executive officer of Los Angeles-based Gen.G.

Gen.G operates teams in seven different video games and has offices in China, South Korea and the U.S. Its franchises include the Overwatch League’s Seoul Dynasty, which will move to South Korea from Los Angeles next year.

In addition to handling that transition, Gen.G is expanding in China, investing in player development and trying to increase revenue from esports-specific areas like streaming and the sale of in-game items.

“The coming years are going see our company really start to crystallize its identity, not just as a brand, but also as an enterprise,” Park said.

To that end, Smith and Honda will join 11-time National Basketball Association All-Star Chris Bosh, already a Gen.G adviser, in helping grow Gen.G’s media presence. That includes creative and commercial projects, and helping Gen.G athletes with content creation.

Other new investors in Gen.G include Battery Ventures, New Enterprise Associates, MasterClass co-founder David Rogier and Stanford University. Silicon Valley Bank, which helped with the fundraising, is becoming both an investor and a sponsor.

Source: https://www.bnnbloomberg.ca/will-smith-takes-slice-of-esports-team-s-us-46-million-financing-1.1245904

ThreeD Capital Inc. $IDK.ca – #Blockchain Goes To Work At #Walmart $WMT, $IBM, #Amazon $AMZN JPMorgan, Cargill and 45 Other Enterprises $HIVE.ca $BLOC.ca $CODE.ca

Posted by AGORACOM-JC at 10:23 AM on Wednesday, April 17th, 2019

SPONSOR: ThreeD Capital Inc. (IDK:CSE) Led by legendary financier, Sheldon Inwentash, ThreeD is a Canadian-based venture capital firm that only invests in best of breed small-cap companies which are both defensible and mass scalable. More than just lip service, Inwentash has financed many of Canada’s biggest small-cap exits. Click Here For More Information.

Idk large
——————-

Blockchain Goes To Work At Walmart, IBM, Amazon, JPMorgan, Cargill and 45 Other Enterprises




Michael del Castillo Forbes Staff

On the Jersey side of the Hudson River just across from Manhattan’s Financial District, there is a glass-and-steel office tower designed in a severe International Style aesthetic. “DTCC” is emblazoned across the top, but few outside of Wall Street realize that in this building, occupied by the Depository Trust & Clearing Corp., are records for most of the world’s securities, representing some $48 trillion in assets—from stocks and bonds to mutual funds and derivatives. In the 1970s, Wall Street created a DTCC predecessor to replace a system that had been powered by young men running around the cavernous alleys of lower Manhattan delivering stock certificates from brokerage house to brokerage house.

DTCC still has paper certificates in its vaults, but records ­related to the 90 million daily transactions it handles are kept electronically on its servers and backed up in various locations. Thousands of financial institutions and exchanges in 130 countries rely on DTCC for custody, clearing, settlement and other clerical ­services. 

In a few months DTCC will begin the largest live implementation of blockchain, the distributed database technology made popular by the bitcoin cryptocurrency. Records for about 50,000 accounts in DTCC’s Trade Information Warehouse, where information on $10 trillion worth of credit derivatives is stored, will move to a customized digital ledger called AxCore. 

According to Rob Palatnick, DTCC’s chief technology architect, the warehouse already keeps an electronic “golden record” of events such as maturity dates, payment calculations and other activities needed to clear and settle these securities daily. But each participant in a complicated credit derivatives transaction also keeps its own records, which must in turn be reconciled multiple times before the investment matures. By moving those records to the blockchain, visible to all participants in real time, most of those redundancies won’t be necessary.

“We’re not talking about eliminating humans and firms,” Pa­l­atnick says. “We’re talking about getting rid of layers of databases and translations between those databases.”

On the other side of the world, in Taipei, Taiwan, Foxconn, the electronics giant best known as a manufacturer of iPhones, launched a Shanghai startup called Chained Finance with a Chinese peer-to-peer lender. Chained will soon connect Foxconn and its many small suppliers (and their suppliers’ suppliers) on an Ethereum-based blockchain that will use its own token and smart contracts (read: automatically executed) to make payments and provide financing in near real time, eliminating a daisy chain of paperwork. 

“We view blockchain as the skeleton of our work,” says Jack Lee, the founder of Foxconn’s venture capital arm, which has invested $40 million in six blockchain startups. “Smart contracts that automatically execute transactions are the muscles, and tokens are the blood.”

Welcome to the brave new world of enterprise blockchain, where corporations are embracing the technology underlying cryptocurrencies like bitcoin and using it to speed up business processes, increase transparency and potentially save billions of dollars. At its core, blockchain is simply a distributed database, with an identical copy stored on many computers. That facilitates transactions (financial or otherwise) between individuals (or companies) that don’t know or trust each other. It’s virtually impossible to cheat, since every transaction is recorded in many ­places and the details of those transactions are visible to everyone. Companies are already using blockchain to track fresh-caught tuna from fishing hooks in the South Pacific to grocery shelves, to speed up insurance claims and to manage medical records. Total corporate and government spending on blockchain should hit $2.9 billion in 2019, an increase of 89% over the previous year, and reach $12.4 billion by 2022, according to the International Data Corp. When PwC surveyed 600 “blockchain-savvy” execs last year, 84% said their companies are involved with blockchain.

To chronicle the rise of so called “enterprise” blockchain,  Forbes has created its first annual Blockchain 50 list of big companies that are putting the technology to work in ­meaningful ways. While blockchain’s first application, cryptocurrency, is struggling to achieve mainstream adoption, these companies are committing manpower and capital to build the future on top of shared databases.

The version of a blockchain future these companies are building is, for the most part, far different from what the founders and early adopters of blockchain had envisioned. While many crypto­currency idealists fantasize about a global, public network of individuals connected directly and democratically, without middle­men, these companies—many of which are middlemen themselves like DTCC—are building private networks they will use to profit from centralized management. 

Not surprisingly, financial firms—from Allianz to Visa and JPMorgan Chase—dominate the list. But Blockchain 50 companies run the gamut of industries, including energy firm BP, retailer Walmart and media company Comcast. 

Because of the lingering bad taste left by bitcoin drug bazaars like Silk Road and the 2017 digital currency bubble, most companies emphasize the distinction between crypto and blockchain, shunning the former and embracing the latter. In some ways the members of the Blockchain 50 represent a bridge between the old and new worlds. Just as internal computer networks were adopted by companies long before the internet took off, these firms are starting by adopting distributed ledger technology at a small scale.

“The era of blockchain tourism has ended,” says Bridget van Kralingen, Senior Vice President for Platforms & Blockchain. “We’ve really seen blockchain move from being overshadowed by cryptocurrency to focus on real business problems and complex processes.”

In 2009, when Satoshi Nakamoto, bitcoin’s pseudonymous creator, activated his network, its blockchain was the underlying accounting system that let anyone with bitcoin transfer money without the need of a middleman. Transactions are processed in blocks—just a fancy word for a hunk of data—about every ten minutes, each containing a compressed version of the previous block, linking them together into a chain. Instead of relying on a bank or another middleman to keep track of when a bitcoin leaves one location and arrives at another, the thousands of computers on the bitcoin network do the work and in exchange for their efforts are paid in bitcoin. 

For most companies this presented a potential problem. While identities aren’t required to use the bitcoin blockchain, the transactions themselves are tied to addresses that are publicly available, meaning that with a bit of work many of these addresses can be tied to actual people or companies. Thus enterprises like Coca-Cola and JPMorgan Chase, accustomed to maintaining competitive advantages based on proprietary processes and control, were initially skeptical of cryptocurrency.

Businesses also need some control over their data. “The entire corporate world has been fashioned around who has responsibility over a particular part of the business flow,” says David Treat, the global head of Accenture’s Financial Services Blockchain practice. “There can be no gaps, because that is unacceptable for a multibillion-dollar company. You cannot have a gap, or you are subject to huge security breaches and social contract breaches.”

Perhaps no firm has had a greater influence on the growing corporate use of blockchain technology than Digital Asset Holdings, a New York-based startup that hired the former JPMorgan Chase banker Blythe Masters as its CEO in early 2015. Under Masters, Digital Asset began making acquisitions and almost immediately purchased a small company that was in the process of building an “invitation only,” or permissioned, blockchain. Then in late 2015 Digital Asset donated the code for its “open ledger” project to the Linux Foundation, which supports commercial open-source software projects, including the Linux operating system.

The project was called Hyperledger, and thanks in part to ­Masters’ connections, its backers read like a who’s who of finance and technology. Thirty companies are listed as founders, including ABN AMRO, Accenture, Cisco, CME Group, IBM, Intel, JPMor­gan Chase, NEC, State Street, VMware and Wells Fargo. Hyper­ledger immediately established itself as the gold standard for corporate blockchain projects.

What happened next might be considered the Big Bang moment of enterprise blockchain. In early 2016, IBM donated 44,000 lines of code to the project, which formed the core of a new blockchain with faster speeds and increased privacy. No fewer than half of the members of the Forbes Blockchain 50 are now using that blockchain, known as Hyperledger Fabric.

“We’ve been very focused on making sure that not only is the blockchain technology standard but that the documents and data are standard,” says Marie Wieck, IBM Blockchain’s general manager. “This standardization allows [the companies] to not spend their time comparing differences and validity in the documents.”

Shortly after the launch of Hyperledger, which is a nonprofit venture, a New York fintech called R3 raised $107 million from the likes of ING, Barclays and UBS to create a for-profit enterprise blockchain platform called Corda Enterprise.

As the commercial potential of co-opting blockchain technology became more apparent, many cryptocurrency startups began to rethink their models.

For example, San Francisco’s Ripple, originally called OpenCoin and conceived of as yet another alternative monetary system, expanded its focus in late 2015 from the cryptocurrency (called ripple and trading as XRP) to building software for large banks. A bitcoin startup called Counterparty spawned another company, Symbiont, in March 2015, which coded a proprietary blockchain that’s now being used by Vanguard for sharing stock index data. In February 2017, ConsenSys, a Brooklyn-based collection of crypto companies controlled by one of Ethereum’s founders, helped launch the Enterprise Ethereum Alliance. 

Just as corporate America co-opted counterculture vibes for its marketing and advertising (“Think Different,” “Don’t Be Evil”), its most forward-thinking businesses are fast incorporating a technology that was designed in large part to eliminate them.

In insurance, for example, MetLife’s mobile app Vitana bundles insurance with a test for gestational diabetes that uses a blockchain to record data and verify and pay claims. In recent testing in Singapore, where one in five expectant mothers develops gestational diabetes, a practitioner simply enters a positive test result into a patient’s electronic medical record and in a matter of seconds MetLife’s smart contract deposits an insurance payment into that patient’s bank account to cover the medical expenses associated with the condition. No paperwork or claim filing necessary.

Similarly, Germany’s Allianz, working with EY, tested moving certain captive insurance claims processes—often involving many emails, attachments and phone calls across multiple times zones—to a private blockchain. The time required to process a claim fell from weeks to hours.

The French bank BNP Paribas, which has lent money to commodities traders since the 19th century, is considering using a ledger platform called Voltron to process letters of credit for traders. Northern Trust has begun administering private equity funds using Hyperledger Fabric. Broadridge Financial has been running pilots testing multiple distributed ledgers for its dominant proxy voting and shareholder communications business.

“In real time, you know who owns the stock, who’s entitled to vote and how it’s tied to the universally-agreed-upon shareholder meeting agenda,” says Michael Tae, Broadridge’s head of strategy.

In the perpetually fraught food business, which regularly endures disasters ranging from E. coli outbreaks to a worker being cooked alive, companies like Nestlé and Bumble Bee Foods are turning to blockchain to secure their supply chains and reduce paperwork.

Golden State Foods, a big McDonald’s supplier that makes more than 400,000 hamburgers per hour, tracks the location and temperature of its patties with devices like radio-frequency ID tags and Hyperledger Fabric. The system can immediately alert GSF to conditions that might lead to spoilage. At the same time, it can optimize inventory levels by tracking how much meat is in a truck or in a restaurant’s freezer, in real time. 

At this year’s SXSW conference in Austin, Texas, Bumble Bee unveiled an SAP-built supply-chain blockchain offering complete transparency to its customers. Soon you will no longer have to take Bumble Bee’s word for it when its assures you that the 12-ounce package of yellowfin tuna you just bought was caught by individual fishermen in the South Pacific and not by a factory ship. The fishing crews, tuna processors and packers are now entering their own data in real time on Bumble Bee’s distributed ledger. By summer, Bumble Bee will be sharing that information with retailers and customers who take the time to check. 

From a public relations standpoint alone, Bumble Bee’s SAP blockchain is likely to bear dividends. In 2017 Greenpeace ranked Bumble Bee 17th out of 20 tuna brands for its sustainability practices, accusing it of “greenwashing” a host of bad behaviors with environmentally friendly marketing.

“Food safety and sustainably sourced product has become an overwhelmingly important topic in our industry,” says Tony Costa, the CIO at Bumble Bee. “Leveraging the latest technology enables us to open it up to more of a public perspective, if you will. So we get out of the business of managing data. We’re relying on a relationship.”

In the healthcare business, an estimated 20 cents of every ­dollar—some $700 billion a year—is wasted because of inefficiencies. Ciox, a little-known company based in Alpharetta, ­Georgia, that manages medical-records exchanges for 60% of the ­hospitals in the U.S., is considering developing a private blockchain that healthcare providers could use—for a fee paid to Ciox—to exchange data. Blockchain 50 enterprises like Ciox and the media giant Comcast, which is toying with using blockchain to micro-target television advertisements, plan to use the privacy features of blockchain to profit from their customers’ data while protecting their identities. 

Despite the surge in corporations working on blockchain projects, the technology is still new, and relatively few have generated significant revenues or savings. 

The one group that is getting rich from the current enterprise blockchain gold rush: consultants. Deloitte, PwC, KPMG, EY and Tata Consultancy Services are deploying small armies to preach the virtues of blockchain to the C-suite and charging huge fees to help companies implement the technology. (We excluded consultants from the Blockchain 50 because they played a key role in helping us ­create the list.) Deloitte, for example, has 1,400 full-time blockchain employees. India’s Tata has 1,000 staffers, 600 of them full-time, in its blockchain unit. Tech firms, including Oracle, SAP and Amazon, are also staking out their turf.

Part technology firm, part consultant, IBM may be the biggest and most successful enterprise blockchain company of all. Besides helping create Hyperledger Fabric, the company has 1,500 staffers—mostly engineers—devoted to the new technology and reports that its IBM Blockchain powers 500 client projects.

IBM Food Trust, for example, counts Walmart, Kroger, Nestlé and ­Carrefour, the French grocer, among its 50-plus members. IBM is also behind TrustChain, a consortium of companies in the supply chain for diamonds and ­jewelry, including Rio Tinto Diamonds, Asahi Refining and Helz­berg Diamonds. Health Utility Network, another Big Blue group, counts three of the five largest U.S. health insurers—Aetna, Cigna and Anthem—as members.

 â€œThe power of any blockchain network is in its participants and its members,” says IBM’s Wieck. It matters little ­whether those members are crypto-idealists or global corporations.

Source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/michaeldelcastillo/2019/04/16/blockchain-goes-to-work/#1116e4e52a40

INTERVIEW: #TSX Venture 50 Company PyroGenesis $PYR.ca Announces Spin Out Of #3D Printing Division & Uplisting $LMT $RTN $NOC $UTX $HPQ.ca $DDD.ca $SSYS $PRLB

Posted by AGORACOM-JC at 4:35 PM on Tuesday, April 16th, 2019

PyroGenesis is one of Canada’s greatest small cap technology companies, with several successful divisions that are succeeding both globally and at the highest levels of business.  The common denominator for each of them is the company’s plasma torch technology.  For example, 2 US Aircraft Carriers (and 2 more on the way) have integrated Pyro’s plasma torch technology for environmental applications.  At $13 Billion per carrier now, one can only imagine the hyper-stringent hoops PyroGenesis had to pass – which puts their technology at the world class level.

In addition to other equally impressive applications, the company’s 3D printing (additive manufacturing) division has also achieved great success in the past year, culminating with a mutually exclusive partnership agreement with Aubert & Duval, a subsidiary of the ERAMET Group with 2017 sales of approximately $CDN 5.4 Billion and assets of approximately $CDN 4.9 billion.  For over 100 years, Aubert & Duval has been a world leader in industrializing high-performance steel, super alloy, aluminum and titanium alloys.  More specifically, they are a recognized supplier of metal powders for additive manufacturing, serving the Aerospace, Energy, Transport, Medical, Defense, Automotive and other large scale, demanding markets.

Just recently, for the second year in a row, the company was nominated for materials company of the year at the 3D printing awards.

Today, PyroGenesis announced the spinout of its 3D printing division in order to unlock value for shareholders and become more attractive to institutional investors that are strictly focused on 3D printing.  In addition, the company believes that uplisting will also make both the new company and the existing company more attractive to institutional investors that are precluded from investing on junior exchanges.

We were proud to sit down with CEO, Peter Pascali, and discuss all the benefits and implications of this major development.  Grab your favourite drink, sit back and watch this great interview! 

PyroGenesis $PYR.ca Board Approves PyroGenesis Additive’s Spin-Off; Uplisting Stock to More Senior Exchange $LMT $RTN $NOC $UTX $HPQ.ca $DDD.ca $SSYS $PRLB

Posted by AGORACOM-JC at 1:33 PM on Tuesday, April 16th, 2019
  • Board of Directors is moving forward with the previously announced spin-off of PyroGenesis Additive, a division specializing in developing, commercializing and advancing plasma-atomized metal powder for the additive manufacturing industry.
  • Additionally, the Company is also considering uplisting its stock to a more senior exchange.   

MONTREAL, April 16, 2019 — PyroGenesis Canada Inc. (http://pyrogenesis.com) (TSX-V: PYR) (OTCQB: PYRNF) (FRA: 8PY), a high-tech company, (the “Company”, the “Corporation” or “PyroGenesis”) that designs, develops, manufactures and commercializes plasma atomized metal powder, plasma waste-to-energy systems and plasma torch  products, today announced that the Board of Directors is moving forward with the previously announced spin-off of PyroGenesis Additive, a division specializing in developing, commercializing and advancing plasma-atomized metal powder for the additive manufacturing (“AM”) industry. Additionally, the Company is also considering uplisting its stock to a more senior exchange.   

Mr. P. Peter Pascali, President and CEO of PyroGenesis, provides this update on today’s announcements in the following Q&A format. The questions, for the most part, are derived from inquiries received from investors, and analysts:

Q. The spin-off of PyroGenesis Additive. It has been a long time in the making.

A.  Indeed it has, and for some very good reasons. The space has been rocked with change and we had to ensure that our investors received maximum return from the spin-off, and at values management felt were fair. I believe that there has been no better time than now to move forward with the spin-off. These strategic delays have effectively increased shareholder’s value.

Q.  Could you explain those reasons to readers who are new to the story?

A. Most certainly.

Almost three years to the day, in the spring of 2016, we announced our intention to spin-off our additive manufacturing capabilities to maximize shareholder value and increase options to the Company. The original idea was to consider a small concurrent financing to fund the immediate need which was essentially to have a first system in place producing powders.

Between the announcement and September 2016, while we were weighing the options and various structures the spin-off could take, GE announced that they had acquired Arcam and Concept Laser (both manufacturers of printers which make metal 3D parts).

GE’s acquisitions arguably disrupted the supply chain of titanium powders to the industry with the indirect acquisition of a subsidiary of Arcam which had become the dominant supplier of such powder to the space. It was imperative that we understood the impact of these acquisitions on our decision to spin-off before we moved forward.

Once we understood the impact of the acquisition on the market, we decided to postpone the spin-off until our first powder production system was assembled which was only a few months away. We then waited until the ramp up was completed. These delays removed any doubts, in the marketplace, that we could produce quality powders, and as such, increased the value of the spin-off to current investors.

Given the reception of our powder by the market (in 2018, we were nominated Materials Company of the Year at the 3D Printing Industry Awards, which speaks to how much we had accomplished in such a short time), we felt we were close to a key contract and/or a significant relationship, and decided to wait until one or the other was in hand.

In the summer of 2018, discussions took place with Aubert & Duval which lead to the joint press release of January 8, 2019 describing a mutually exclusive relationship with respect to the distribution of PyroGenesis’ titanium powder to the AM industry in Europe.        

Given what has taken place, and what we know now, management has made a strategic decision to spin-off PyroGenesis Additive at this time.     

Q. Why spin-off PyroGenesis Additive in the first place?

A. There are a number of reasons, but they all boil down to one goal: simplicity.

The reason to spin-off PyroGenesis Additive is primarily to attract an investor base best suited to their unique value proposition, particular business operations, and financial characteristics, thereby maximizing shareholders’ value and placing it in a better position to generate revenues and develop strategic relationships than had it remained part of the PyroGenesis stable of technologies.

The simpler an offering is the easier it is for analysts to understand and value it properly. As it stands now PyroGenesis Additive is part of PyroGenesis Canada Inc’s offerings which include Drosrite™, US Military, and Purevap™, just to name a few, and as such makes it complicated to analyze.  Add to this that analysts typically specialize in one sector or another, and as such may very well be able to fully value PyroGenesis’ Additive’s offering, but would be hard pressed to do equal justice to PyroGenesis’ other business lines, and you have a significantly undervalued group of assets. Spinning one group off would unlock this value.

Simplifying an offering would also make it easier to attract investment. There are large pools of money interested in investing in the AM space, but have no desire to have their funds comingled with unrelated business lines. A spin-off would assure them that such funds would be used for AM alone.

Last but not least, a spin-off creates a well understood entity with which interested parties could joint venture or acquire.
Bottom line: a spin-off creates simplicity, which in and of itself, increases interest, all to the benefit of shareholders.

Q. Any challenges in a spin-off?

A. There are many, but the two that I think are key are timing and structure. The timing and structure of a spin-off is critical to its survivability.  The spin-off must be done in a context where it can grow and mature, not much different from a young adult leaving home.

It is management’s firm belief that given recent announcements, and what we anticipate taking place in the near term, spinning-off PyroGenesis Additive is now overdue.

Q. Are there any other factors motivating your decision to spin-off PyroGenesis Additive at this particular time?

A. Yes. There is a huge interest by our partners to spin-off PyroGenesis Additive for all the reasons given above. This is a major factor in our decision to move forward now.

Q. You also announced today that you are considering an uplisting. Could you describe what this means? 

A. The Company’s stock currently trades on the TSX Venture Exchange (“TSX-V”).  Although a good exchange it does have its limitations.  It may be a good place for a company to list initially but, in time, a company should consider moving to a bigger and better exchange. By bigger and better I mean one which will attract more interest and as such attract greater investment which by default would translate into a higher stock price. This is a natural progression and the TSX-V boasts of the number of companies that have uplisted from their platform.

I think it would be more appropriate to say that we are considering which exchange to uplist on, rather than considering an uplisting. It has already been decided that we have to become listed on a more senior exchange, sooner than later.

Q. What would be the timing and what are the next steps? 

A. Both uplistings and spin-offs require regulatory approval and depending on the type and number of questions from the regulators, will determine the time it takes to complete. Assuming nothing out of the ordinary, either one could take 4-6 months. 

Next steps would be to engage a Canadian based law firm, which we are in the process of doing, and to engage an investment bank. We are currently receiving proposals from investment bankers on both sides of the border.

Q. What could delay the process?

A. As I said the process requires regulatory review and approvals. There could be delays associated with this. Other than that, funds. The process requires capital to complete although a large part of it is success based and back-ended.

Q. Assuming money is not an object, and that the regulatory approval process is not unduly burdensome, when are you targeting these events to be completed?

A. Both in 2019, this year, but failing that, one this year and the other by Q1, 2020.

Q. Do you care to add any concluding remarks?

A.  Yes, I would.

There has been a flurry of developments within our PyroGenesis Additive segment. We started the year by announcing a significant agreement with a multi-billion-dollar European Company to market our powders to Europe on a mutually exclusive basis. This was followed by our unveiling of our NexGen™ Plasma Atomization process with production rates that shattered all published plasma atomization production rates.  Next, we announced that we had shipped specialty powders to a government entity which was quickly followed by the announcement that we had successfully produced titanium powders with the NexGen™.
During this time, we were also nominated for the second year in a row as Materials Company of the Year at the 3D Printing Industry Awards 2019.

There is a consensus building that such news belongs on a better platform. Management concurs, and is taking the necessary steps.

About PyroGenesis Canada Inc.

PyroGenesis Canada Inc., a high-tech company, is the world leader in the design, development, manufacture and commercialization of advanced plasma processes and products. We provide engineering and manufacturing expertise, cutting-edge contract research, as well as turnkey process equipment packages to the defense, metallurgical, mining, advanced materials (including 3D printing), oil & gas, and environmental industries. With a team of experienced engineers, scientists and technicians working out of our Montreal office and our 3,800 m2 manufacturing facility, PyroGenesis maintains its competitive advantage by remaining at the forefront of technology development and commercialization. Our core competencies allow PyroGenesis to lead the way in providing innovative plasma torches, plasma waste processes, high-temperature metallurgical processes, and engineering services to the global marketplace. Our operations are ISO 9001:2015 certified, and have been since 1997. PyroGenesis is a publicly-traded Canadian Corporation on the TSX Venture Exchange (Ticker Symbol: PYR) and on the OTCQB Marketplace. For more information, please visit www.pyrogenesis.com

This press release contains certain forward-looking statements, including, without limitation, statements containing the words “may”, “plan”, “will”, “estimate”, “continue”, “anticipate”, “intend”, “expect”, “in the process” and other similar expressions which constitute “forward- looking information” within the meaning of applicable securities laws. Forward-looking statements reflect the Corporation’s current expectation and assumptions and are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated. These forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties including, but not limited to, our expectations regarding the acceptance of our products by the market, our strategy to develop new products and enhance the capabilities of existing products, our strategy with respect to research and development, the impact of competitive products and pricing, new product development, and uncertainties related to the regulatory approval process. Such statements reflect the current views of the Corporation with respect to future events and are subject to certain risks and uncertainties and other risks detailed from time-to-time in the Corporation’s ongoing filings with the securities regulatory authorities, which filings can be found at www.sedar.com, or at www.otcmarkets.com. Actual results, events, and performance may differ materially. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. The Corporation undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward- looking statements either as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by applicable securities laws. Neither the TSX Venture Exchange, its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) nor the OTCQB accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this press release.

SOURCE PyroGenesis Canada Inc.

For further information please contact: Clémence Bertrand-Bourlaud, Marketing Manager/Investor Relations, Phone: (514) 937-0002, E-mail: [email protected]  

RELATED LINKS: http://www.pyrogenesis.com/

Esports Entertainment Group $GMBL – #HIVE Berlin: Jens Hilgers, Peter Warman Discuss Trends in #Esports $TECHF $ATVI $TTWO $GAME $EPY.ca $FDM.ca $TNA.ca

Posted by AGORACOM-JC at 9:00 PM on Monday, April 15th, 2019
SPONSOR: Esports Entertainment $GMBL Esports audience is 350M, growing to 590M, Esports wagering is projected at $23 BILLION by 2020. The company has launched VIE.gg esports betting platform and has accelerated affiliate marketing agreements with 190 Esports teams. Click here for more information
GMBL: OTCQB

———————–

HIVE Berlin: Jens Hilgers, Peter Warman Discuss Trends in Esports

  • Warman spoke about gatekeeping in the industry and the challenges of breaking in, and estimated that between himself and Hilgers, they have collectively taken more than 1,000 calls over the years from people who want to get into esports

By: Andrew Hayward

At the HIVE esports business conference in Berlin this week, influential minds from across the industry gathered to discuss the future of esports. Before the wide-ranging panels began, Jens Hilgers and Peter Warman took the stage to explore some of the trends they’ve seen and expect to see in the future.

Both are long-standing fixtures of the esports industry. Hilgers has spent more than two decades in esports, co-founding Turtle Entertainment  and ESL  in 2000 and serving as its CEO until 2010, when he transitioned to the role of chairman of the board until 2015. He has also co-founded G2 Esports  and tools maker DOJO Madness , and is a founding partner in BITKRAFT Esports Ventures . Warman, meanwhile, is the CEO and founder of gaming and esports analytics firm Newzoo , which was established in 2007.

“Every single time that something like that has happened in history, it was the most important and most exciting times for me.”

Warman spoke about gatekeeping in the industry and the challenges of breaking in, and estimated that between himself and Hilgers, they have collectively taken more than 1,000 calls over the years from people who want to get into esports—whether it’s startups, brands, media, or financial services. Carefully explaining the industry to people who are outside of it is critical, although both said that detailing the subject to government representatives is a less enjoyable situation.

“You sometimes have to explain what the hell is going on,” said Warman. Added Hilgers: “I try to avoid those meetings… those are the most frustrating ones.”

Many more people in recent years have seen the boom around esports, said Warman, between the excitement building around the industry and the money flowing into it. But newcomers who think that esports is a completely new thing need to be educated that it’s actually a long-running, gradually-maturing industry, he said.

“We have to explain to people: this esports thing—it’s been around for a long time,” said Warman. “It’s not this ‘hockey stick’ expectation, new industry thing, but a very healthy and growing business.”

Amidst all of the excitement and investment around the space, however, Warman and Hilgers both said that people in the space need to manage expectations for incoming stakeholders, in part to help avoid the possibility of a bubble. Warman added that part of managing expectations is making it clear that the rise of esports is not a standalone thing—that the underlying growth is tied into the popularity gaming and other industries and technologies. It’s also a matter of new generations growing up with gaming, esports, and digital devices.

“You sometimes have to explain what the hell is going on.”

“What I’ve been observing for the last 23 years in my career,” said Hilgers, “is that when we see the growth year-over-year in esports, it’s mostly driven by digital natives growing up with video games and the paradigm of esports.”

Looking back on his career to date, Hilgers pointed to key games that have defined or redefined genres and helped boost esports at that time. He noted the impact of Counter-Strike , World of Warcraft , and League of Legends  in the past, and more recently Fortnite , as each raised the bar for its respective genre and the level of competition and interest around it. If that kind of trend continues, then Hilgers said that we could see another paradigm-shifting competitive game in two to four years’ time that might draw even larger numbers of players and viewers.

“Every single time that something like that has happened in history, it was the most important and most exciting times for me,” said Hilgers, “because these new, genre-defining games truly elevated competitive multiplayer gaming and esports.”

Related Article: ESL’s David Hiltscher on Helping Fans ‘Commit With Their Wallets’ to Teams

Warman pointed to the exponential growth of both gaming and esports over the years compared to other types of popular media. He said that the wider gaming industry’s evolving focus on engaging fans, making them happy, and providing them free tools before expecting any kind of payment is helping to drive that. That’s seen both with free-to-play games and freely-streamed esports tournaments and related content.

“What makes us very special in games is we put time first before money,” he said. “That’s the secret sauce of our business.”

“I think there’s going to be a generation of games going forward that actually will start the design process by reflecting these assumptions in the right way.”

But there’s a fine line to walk, he continued, as some people have more time than money, while others have plenty of money and are willing to spend it within games. Creators in both the game development and esports sides of the games industry need to balance the accessibility on one end with premium features and services on the other. “We are entertaining people who don’t want to spend money or don’t have money, but have a lot of time,” said Warman. “And people that have a shitload of money, and they will all spend it in our game. One single environment has to serve both. Think about it: that’s very, very hard.”

Hilgers spoke about the impact of Fortnite and how its success has come in part from breaking the mold of the battle royale genre. It’s a competitive game, yes, but the colorful experience is also more accessible and targeted at a less die-hard audience. Games like Apex Legends, Call of Duty , and Overwatch  have more of a hardcore fan base, he said, while some Fortnite players simply want to play casually and hang out with friends in the game. It has wide-ranging appeal.

When it comes to the next wave of esports games, however, he said that developers need to consider the viewing experience as much as the gameplay and moment-to-moment action. “Having a game that is equally great to spectate and to watch as it is to play the game will ultimately make for the best esports games,” said Hilgers. He doesn’t believe that most games in the market now were built with that kind of mentality, but that developers are learning lessons from today’s games and their challenges, and that the next generation of esports-ready titles will be better poised to deliver on both fronts.

“I think there’s going to be a generation of games going forward that actually will start the design process by reflecting these assumptions in the right way,” he said, “and that will lead to a greater entertainment offering and elevate esports.”

Source: https://esportsobserver.com/hive-berlin-hilgers-warman/